Skip to content
Nanayojana

Sentiment risk — SWISSTEK (CEYLON) PLC

Tone divergence between public and risk sections, negative risk sentiment, obfuscation.

Model weight: 15% of the total score.

Signals in this category

  • sentiment divergence
  • negative risk sentiment
  • yoy negative sentiment spike
  • section obfuscation
  • high complexity disclosure
  • elevated uncertainty language
  • boilerplate disclosure

Sub-score — FY2016

4.0

Moderate (4.0)

From the annual recalculation record for FY2016.

Materials sector average for FY2016: 0.7 — this company is above the sector average.

Events (10)

Severity Signal Points Year Source section Evidence
Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2014 commitments contingencies
View evidence

section commitments_contingencies: litigious language 9.7/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2014 related party transactions
View evidence

section related_party_transactions: litigious language 23.1/1000 words

Low boilerplate disclosure +1 2013 risk management
View evidence

section risk_management is 0.991 cosine-similar to the prior year's report (id 2622) — largely unchanged text

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2013 risk management
View evidence

section risk_management: litigious language 11.2/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2013 related party transactions
View evidence

section related_party_transactions: litigious language 19.6/1000 words

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2013 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies complexity score 66.7 (passive voice density 0.8598, jargon density 24.006)

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2012 commitments contingencies
View evidence

section commitments_contingencies: litigious language 11.4/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2012 risk management
View evidence

section risk_management: litigious language 10.9/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2012 related party transactions
View evidence

section related_party_transactions: litigious language 9.0/1000 words

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2012 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies complexity score 66.4 (passive voice density 0.9143, jargon density 21.5564)