Skip to content
Nanayojana

Sentiment risk — NAWALOKA HOSPITALS PLC

Tone divergence between public and risk sections, negative risk sentiment, obfuscation.

Model weight: 15% of the total score.

Signals in this category

  • sentiment divergence
  • negative risk sentiment
  • yoy negative sentiment spike
  • section obfuscation
  • high complexity disclosure
  • elevated uncertainty language
  • boilerplate disclosure

Sub-score — FY2013

5.4

Moderate (5.4)

From the annual recalculation record for FY2013.

Health Care Equipment & Services sector average for FY2013: 0.6 — this company is above the sector average.

Events (12)

Severity Signal Points Year Source section Evidence
Low boilerplate disclosure +1 2015 risk management
View evidence

section risk_management is 0.977 cosine-similar to the prior year's report (id 2461) — largely unchanged text

Low boilerplate disclosure +1 2015 audit committee
View evidence

section audit_committee is 0.986 cosine-similar to the prior year's report (id 2461) — largely unchanged text

Low boilerplate disclosure +1 2015 notes
View evidence

section notes is 0.982 cosine-similar to the prior year's report (id 2461) — largely unchanged text

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2015 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies: litigious language 8.1/1000 words

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2015 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies complexity score 69.1 (passive voice density 0.8125, jargon density 29.7297)

Low boilerplate disclosure +1 2014 risk management
View evidence

section risk_management is 1.000 cosine-similar to the prior year's report (id 2462) — largely unchanged text

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2013 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies complexity score 65.7 (passive voice density 0.9118, jargon density 20.1794)

Low boilerplate disclosure +1 2012 audit committee
View evidence

section audit_committee is 0.982 cosine-similar to the prior year's report (id 2464) — largely unchanged text

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2012 commitments contingencies
View evidence

section commitments_contingencies: litigious language 15.2/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2012 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies: litigious language 8.1/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2012 notes
View evidence

section notes: litigious language 14.3/1000 words

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2012 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies complexity score 65.5 (passive voice density 0.9515, jargon density 19.469)