Skip to content
Nanayojana

Sentiment risk — C T LAND DEVELOPMENT PLC

Tone divergence between public and risk sections, negative risk sentiment, obfuscation.

Model weight: 15% of the total score.

Signals in this category

  • sentiment divergence
  • negative risk sentiment
  • yoy negative sentiment spike
  • section obfuscation
  • high complexity disclosure
  • elevated uncertainty language
  • boilerplate disclosure

Sub-score — FY2011

0.0

None (0.0)

From the annual recalculation record for FY2011.

Real Estate Management&Development sector average for FY2011: 0.0 — this company is in line with the sector average.

Events (8)

Severity Signal Points Year Source section Evidence
Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2015 commitments contingencies
View evidence

section commitments_contingencies: litigious language 11.8/1000 words

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2015 commitments contingencies
View evidence

section commitments_contingencies complexity score 65.3 (passive voice density 1.1176, jargon density 21.2264)

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2014 commitments contingencies
View evidence

section commitments_contingencies: litigious language 9.9/1000 words

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2014 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies complexity score 72.2 (passive voice density 1.1111, jargon density 45.5635)

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2013 risk management
View evidence

section risk_management: litigious language 8.0/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2013 commitments contingencies
View evidence

section commitments_contingencies: litigious language 24.2/1000 words

Low elevated uncertainty language +1 2013 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies: litigious language 16.2/1000 words

Low high complexity disclosure +1 2013 accounting policies
View evidence

section accounting_policies complexity score 72.2 (passive voice density 0.9474, jargon density 46.4037)